Toronto School of Communication

by Twyla Gibson, Ph.D.
Senior McLuhan Fellow

Plato:  His Education, Teaching and Writing

Though it appears we have everything that Plato wrote, there is not much evidence concerning his life, his education and his teaching in the Academy.[1]  The most important record of his activities are the Letters that have come down through the tradition as part of the canon.  Plato's Letters are significant - even though their authenticity has always subject to debate - because they are the only place in his writings where we find autobiographical statements.  Next in importance are the comments by Aristotle and by other early authors, and, finally, the statements of Diogenes Laertius.  Though Diogenes lived in the earlier half of the third century, he had access to the texts of ancient writers that we do not have.  Since, as Eduard Zeller once noted, the tradition concerning ancient philosophers "has more and more to tell, the further it lies, chronologically, from the events," let us consider the sources in reverse order, from least to most reliable.[2]

Diogenes Laertius's Account  

In his book, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Diogenes Laertius noted that Plato was born in the 88th Olympiad (about 428 B.C.E.).  He was either eighty-one or eighty-four when he died.[3]  He was originally named Aristocles, after his grandfather.  Both his father and his mother came from noble Athenian families.  He had two brothers, Adeimantus and Glaucon, as well as a sister, Potone.  He was educated in the school of Dionysius and then, later, he studied philosophy with the followers of Heraclitus.  He excelled at gymnastics and wrestling.  Some say his wrestling teacher, Ariston, renamed him Plato - which means "broad" or "wide" - on account of his "robust figure."  Others say the name Plato came from "the breadth of his style" (III. 4).  As Plato grew older, he applied himself to the composition of lyric poems and tragedies.  In 408 B.C., when he was twenty, he was about to enter one of his compositions into a competition when he heard Socrates speak in front of the theatre of Dionysus.  He abandoned poetry and from then onwards, attached himself to Socrates.  In 399, Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth with false teachings about the gods, and with introducing new gods into Greece.  He was executed by poison.  When Socrates was gone, Plato joined the circle of Cratylus the Heraclitean.  Then, he studied with Hermogenes who taught the philosophy of Parmenides.  When he was twenty-eight, he began traveling.  He went to Megara for a time with some of the other disciples of Socrates, and there he studied with Euclides.  Later, he spent time in Cyrene with Theodorus the mathematician.  After that, he journeyed to Italy to visit with the Pythagoreans, Eurytus and Philolaus.  Philolaus (perhaps late fifth century) wrote a book entitled, On Nature (VIII. 84-85), making him the first Pythagorean to write and to publish the doctrines which had been kept secret until then (VIII. 15).  When Plato's studies with the Pythagoreans ended, he traveled to Egypt "to see those who interpreted the will of the gods" (III. 6)  Eventually, he accepted an appointment arranged by his friend Dion to act as tutor to the younger Dionysius, son of the tyrant Dionysius of Syracuse, a Greek city in Sicily.  Plato returned to Athens when he was about forty and established the Academy in a grove outside the city walls.  Later, the seventeen-year-old Aristotle became one of Plato's students and took up residence at the school.  Some reports say that he stayed for twenty years.  Others say that he remained until Plato's death.  About 367, Plato made a second trip to Italy.  He tried to convince the younger Dionysius - who had by then inherited the realm - to create a constitution based on his model of the ideal state.  The younger Dionysius agreed but then he decided that Plato's republic was too austere and he broke his word.   About 387, he dismissed Plato from the court and threw him in prison.  His release was secured by the Pythagorean Archytas (fourth century B.C.E.), who wrote to Dionysius, procured a pardon and arranged for Plato's safe return to Athens.  In 360, Plato made a third trip to Italy.  This trip ended in disaster as well.  After that, he stayed out of politics and concentrated on teaching. 

Some sources say that Plato wrote to Dion and persuaded him to purchase three Pythagorean treatises from Philolaus for one hundred minae (a fortune at the time), and that it was from these texts that he learned to write the Timaeus and the Republic.  Other authorities say that the book was a gift, given to Plato for securing the release from prison of one of Philolaus' disciples.  According to a third source, there was only one book.  This, Plato bought himself from the relatives of Philolaus on one of his trips to Sicily and from it he transcribed the Timaeus (VIII. 84-85).  According to traditional sources, Plato "transcribed a great deal" from other authors and in particular, he "employed the words" of the Pythagorean Epicarmus (550-460 B.C.E.).  Plato also drew upon the mimes of Sophron, modeling his characters in this style.  He was the first philosopher to refute the speech of Lysias, which he set out word for word in the Phaedrus.  He was a rival of Xenophon, who had been another pupil of Socrates.  They both wrote similar narratives, including a Defense of Socrates, a Symposium, a Republic, and various moral treatises (Lives III. 34).  In fact, Aristoxenus said that nearly all of Plato's Republic was a replication of the Controversies of Protagoras (III. 36-39). 

To many of his contemporaries, Plato's philosophy was incomprehensible.  According to Diogenes, "he employed a number of different terms to make his system less intelligible to the ignorant."  He used the same word in contexts where they have a very different meaning, he employed different words to represent the same thing, and he expressed the same thing by way of contrary expressions.  When Plato first read the Phaedo to an audience, only Aristotle stayed to the end; the rest of the assembly got up and walked away. 

Plato died at a wedding feast when he was an old man.  His friends discovered a copy of the mimes of Sophron under his pillow; the Laws were left on wax tablets, and they found that the early part of the Republic had been revised several times.  Speusippus, the son of Plato's sister, succeeded him as head of the Academy.

Reports on Plato's Teaching From the Early Commentators

Diogenes' report that Plato's philosophy incorporated many phrases and doctrines from earlier thinkers was based on a number of ancient reports.  Aristobulus, (ap.  Clem. Al. Strom I. 22; cf. Eus. Praep. Ev. XIII. 12.); Clement of Alexandria (Stromateis I. 22. 131, 2-6); Eusebius (Praeparatio Evangelica X. 1I, XI. I); and Origen (Contra Celsum IV. 39, VI. 19) all stated that Plato borrowed from the Hebrew philosophers, altered their precepts slightly, and inserted them into his system of doctrines.

Similarly, Diogenes' account of the audience walking out on Plato's reading of the Phaedo is just one version of the story concerning this famous incident.  There are many references in the Greek commentators on Aristotle to Plato's lecture On the Good.  Our most reliable source concerning this speech (or series of talks) comes from Aristotle's student, Aristoxenus, who recounts:

as Aristotle used often to relate . . . most of the audience that attended Plato's lectures on the good . . . came . . . in the conviction that they would get from the lectures some one or other of the things that the world calls good; riches or health, or strength, in fine, some extraordinary gift of fortune.  But when they found that Plato's reasonings were of sciences and numbers, and geometry, and astronomy, and of good and unity as predicates of the finite . . . their disenchantment was complete.  The result was that some of them sneered at the thing, while others vilified it  (Harmonics 30.10-31).[4]

Apparently, people did not anticipate that Plato's "good" would involve numbers, geometry, unity, and the notion of limit.  Simplicius, in his commentary on Aristotle's Physics (187a12: 151), refers to the lecture On the Good (Phys. 545.23), saying that this talk was attended by a number of Plato's students, including Aristotle, who wrote down his "enigmatic utterances."[5]  Different versions of the story come to us from Proclus in his commentary on the Philebus,[6] and from Themistius.[7]  Another piece of evidence concerning Plato's teaching indicates that many of his educated contemporaries could not fathom his philosophy.  A fragment of a comedy by Epicrates (frag. 11) tells of a physician who passed by the Academy and witnessed Plato teaching a group of his students.  All of them were engaged in "distinguishing and defining the kinds of animals and plants."  They were huddled together, silently contemplating a gourd.  "Suddenly and without straightening up one said: 'It's a round vegetable'; another: 'It's a grass'; a third: 'It's a shrub'." Their procedure was so puzzling to the doctor that he pronounced their activity "nonsense."  Apparently, Plato and his students were unperturbed, and "went on drawing their distinctions."[8]

Aristotle's Testimony Concerning Plato's Education

Aristotle is the most important secondary source for the biography of Plato.  In the Metaphysics (I. IV. 9-v. 1-VI. 10), he describes Plato's education and how his philosophy was influenced by his various teachers.  In the Poetics (II. 47b8-10), he discusses Plato's writing style.

The passage in the Metaphysics is significant because it contains the only comments about Plato as a person in the surviving texts of his most famous student.  Though in other treatises, Aristotle mentions Plato by name and discusses his philosophical doctrines, he is silent about the character and personality of his master, about events surrounding his life, and about his relations with other people.  Nor do Aristotle's  extant writings contain a single account of his experiences at Plato's Academy.[9]  Despite its significance, caution must be exercised in accepting as fact the evidence from this testimony, for the Metaphysics, as Werner Jaeger demonstrated, is a collection that was assembled after Aristotle's death.[10]  Little is known about which of its parts contain Aristotle's own writing, how much of it accommodated earlier works, or what adaptations were made by editors.  Even so, it is as close as we come to an eyewitness report. 

Aristotle says that Plato followed the philosophy of the Pythagoreans, but he added to it certain peculiar features that made his teaching distinctive.  This was because, as a young man, Plato studied the Heraclitean doctrines with Cratylus.  He embraced the view that sensibles are a state of flux and so there can be no secure knowledge of them.  Plato continued to adhere to these doctrines from then onward.  Later, he studied with Socrates, who did not deal with the physical universe but focussed instead on moral questions, seeking the universal definitions.  Plato combined the thought of Socrates with the Heraclitean doctrines concerning flux.  He came to believe that inquiry was not concerned with sensible things but with "entities of another kind," since there can be no general definition of things that are always changing.  He called these other entities "ideas," says Aristotle, and he held that all sensible things which have the same name as the forms exist by participation in them.

In the Poetics (II. 47b8-10), Aristotle defines three different kinds of imitation and classifies Plato's writing style as one of them.  He mentions that one form of imitation used verses alone, one used prose without rhythm, and a new kind of composition mixed poetry with prose discourse.  This third kind of art was so new, says Aristotle, there was as yet no name for it.  As examples of this form of imitation, he describes the mimes of Sophron, Xenarchus, and the Socratic discourses.  It is assumed that the expression, "Socratic discourses," refers to Plato's writings, and that Aristotle classifies them as a mixture of prose and poetry.[11]

Plato's Letters

The most reliable source for Plato's biography comes from his own Letters, which date from the last two decades of his life and relate to his travels to Italy and his activities there.  Most refer to his friendship with Dion and his involvement in the politics of Syracuse.  Some refer to Plato's association with the Pythagoreans.  Letters Nine and Twelve were addressed to Archytas of Tarentum (the Pythagorean who arranged with Dionysius for Plato's release from prison).  This correspondence indicates that Plato and Archytas were engaged in finding, recording and preserving the Pythagorean philosophy.  Archytas says in his letter to Plato that he is sending him treatises on Law, Kingship, Piety, and the Origin of the Universe.  He mentions that the rest were nowhere to be found.[12]  In reply, Plato says that he had received the writings and was returning some of his own even though they were not yet completed.  These treatises, he states, should be kept under guard (Ltr. XII 359 d-e). 

That Plato was involved with others in a major effort to preserve the Pythagorean philosophy is supported by a passage in the Thirteenth Letter (360b), where Plato writes, "Here then is something we must keep alive. . . . So I am doing my part now to effect this by sending you herewith some Pythagorean treatises and some classifications."  In line with the Pythagorean tradition of silence concerning their doctrines,[13] Plato warns in the Second Letter (314-315),  'Take precautions, lest this teaching ever be disclosed."  He says that he is couching the doctrine concerning the nature of the first principle of this philosophy in riddles, lest his letter fall into the wrong hands (Ltr. II 312e).  He describes some sort of "incredible doctrine," and how it had been preserved and transmitted.

For it is through being repeated and listened to frequently for many years that these doctrines are refined at length, like gold, with prolonged labor.  But listen to the most remarkable result of all.  Quite a number of men there are who have listened to these doctrines - men capable of learning and capable also of holding them in mind and judging them by all sorts of tests - and who have been hearers of mine for no less than thirty years and are now quite old; and these men now declare that the doctrines that they once held to be most incredible appear to them now the most credible, and what they then held most credible now appears the opposite (Ltr. II 314a-b).

The emphasis on repeating and listening in this description makes it clear that this was an oral doctrine that was passed on by face-to-face communication.  With respect to this "doctrine" and "teaching" (Ltr. II 313d),  Plato's advice was to "avoid writing and learn by heart; for it is not possible that what is written down should not get divulged."  He continued, "That is the reason why I have never written anything about these things, and why there is not and will not be any written work of Plato's own.  What are now called his are the work of a Socrates embellished and modernized" (Ltr. II 314c), or (as it has sometimes been translated), as "a Socrates become fair and young."[14]  Plato continued with the following instruction, "Farewell and believe.  Read this letter now at once many times and burn it" (Ltr. II 314b-c). 

Read On: Milman Parry:  The Oral-Formulaic Style of the Homeric Tradition

Read Back: The Platonic Canon



[1] Our knowledge of early Greek literature and philosophy is based on two kinds of evidence:  (1) fragments, mainly in the form of quotations containing the philosopher's actual words, and (2) testimonia, the descriptions of the philosophers' teaching reported by later writers.  The fragments of quotations that have come down to us provide the most valuable source of information.  To fill in the gaps around fragments, we must rely on the reports of other authors.  Both fragments and testimonia tend to be found in the same sources.  The following are the most significant.  After Plato, the earliest source is Aristotle, who sometimes initiates his discussion of philosophical problems by surveying the views of his intellectual forebears.  He seldom quotes the exact words of his predecessors.  The accounts he gives of the tradition - in Metaphysics 1 and Physics 1 - are the earliest we have.  Aristobulus (probably the second half of the second century B.C.E.), was the author of a work known to us only through quotations in Clement of Alexandria and Eusebius.  Aristoxenus, the theorist to whom we owe almost all our knowledge of the musical theory of Ancient Greece, was Aristotle's pupil, as was Theophrastus.  Cicero (mid-first century B.C.E.) was a prolific writer and frequently quoted the early Greek philosophers.  This Roman orator and statesman wrote significant accounts of post-Aristotelian Greek philosophy that include historical surveys of the philosophical views of the Presocratics.  Quintilian (born 35 C.E., date of death unknown), was a Roman rhetorician and teacher.  His one surviving work, the Institutio Oratoria, contains numerous comments and stories of the ancient Greek authors.  Clement of Alexandria (150 C.E.), was an Athenian who converted to Christianity.  His writings contain numerous quotations from the early Greek literature.  Origen (184-255 C.E.), was born in Alexandria of Christian parents.  He was a famed teacher, and wrote many works dealing with Greek philosophy.  The Didaskalikos by Alcinous (second century C.E. and long identified erroneously with the middle Platonist Albinus), is a significant document of one school of second century C.E. Platonism.  It served as the standard introduction to Platonism in the Byzantine period and the Renaissance.  Numenius of Apamea (second century C.E.), was said by Longinus to be the culmination of a long line of Pythagorean writers (ap. Porph. V. Plot. 20).  We have today only fragments of his works.  Sextus Empiricus (late second century C.E.), was a physician of the empirical school and a follower of the skeptic Aenesidemus.  He wrote three books, Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Against the Dogmatists, and Against the Schoolmasters.  The first is a work of skeptical philosophy.  The latter two are concerned primarily with cognition and sense perception and contain numerous quotations of earlier philosophers.  Diogenes Laertius probably lived in the earlier half of the third century.  His book, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, somewhat uncritically compiles material from a number of sources that have not survived.  Eusebius (260-339 C.E.), was an early Christian historian who cited many ancient sources in his works.  Simplicius lived in the sixth century C.E.  He wrote commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, De Anima, De Caelo and Physics. He explicated Aristotle's critiques of the early Greeks by citing the words of the philosophers themselves.  In so doing, he provided extensive extracts, noting that the older writings had become rare [see Richard D. McKirahan, Jr. Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary (Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1994), pp. 1-6; and J. M. Robinson, An Introduction to Early Greek Philosophy (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1968), pp. 309-312].

[2] Eduard Zeller, Die Philosophie der Griechen in Ihrer Geschichtlichen Entwicklung, ed., Wilhelm Nestle (13th edition, Leipzig, 1928), p. 364.

[3] Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Vol. I, trans. R.D. Hicks (1925; rpt. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press, LCL 184, 1991), p. 277, 313.

[4] Henry S.  Macran, trans., The Harmonics of Aristoxenus (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1902), p. 88-89.

[5] As cited in Konrad Gaiser, "Plato's Enigmatic Lecture: 'On The Good,' " Phronesis, 25 (1980): 5-37.  See also Sir David Ross, Plato's Theory of Ideas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953), p. 148; and A.E. Taylor, Plato: The Man and His Work (New York: Meridian, 1926, 1927, 1956), p. 503.

[6] "[Interpreters] raise the question whether philosophers should read out their writings before an audience, as Zeno did; and they insist, if one does so, only to read material suited to the audience so as not to suffer the same fate as Plato when he announced a lecture On the Good.  A great throng of all kinds of people assembled: but when he delivered his lecture, they did not understand his argument, and went away one by one until finally they had almost all gone.  But Plato knew that this would happen to him, and had told his followers beforehand not to refuse entry to anyone, since the lecture would still only take place before their group" [Proclus, Commentary on Plato's Philebus, translated in Victor Cousin (Paris: Budé, 1864), p. 688].

[7] Themistius says, "It did not in the least prevent wise old Plato from being wise on the occasion of his lecture in the Piraeus when people came flocking from all around and assembled together - not only the townspeople from above but also workers from the fields and vineyards and from the silver-works - and when he presented his treatise On the Good, the huge crowd became dazed and streamed away from the place until finally the audience was reduced to Plato's trusted followers only" [Oratio 21, 245 c-d, as cited in Gaiser, "Plato's Enigmatic Lecture," pp. 9-10.

[8] Epicrates, frag. 11, ed., T. Kock, Comicorum Attocorum Fragmenta, Vol. II (Leipzig, 1884), p. 287.  Also translated and quoted in Harold Cherniss, The Riddle of the Early Academy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945), p. 63.

[9] Further, Ryle provides an outline of numerous features in Plato's writings about which Aristotle seems unaware [Plato's Progress, pp. 2-10].

[10] Werner Jaeger, Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development, translation with the author's corrections and additions by Richard Robinson, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1948), p. 168ff.

[11] As Gerald F. Else pointed out, ". . . we think naturally of Plato's, but he did not invent the genre and was far from being the only practitioner of it.  Indeed, one theory maintains that Plato took up the writing of Socratic dialogues in order to correct misinterpretations by others" [see his translation of Aristotle's Poetics (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1970), fn. 7, p. 81.]

[12] Diogenes is our only source for Archytas's letter to Plato.  Since he documents Plato's Twelfth Letter verbatim, it is reasonable to assume that he recorded Archytas's letter accurately as well.  

[13] On the secrecy of the Pythagoreans, Diogenes Laertius (VIII. 15) mentions that for centuries after the death of Pythagoras, "down to the time of Philolaus, it was impossible to obtain any knowledge of any Pythagorean doctrine."  From  Porphyry, we learn that "What he taught his disciples no one can say for certain, for they maintained a remarkable silence" [Vita Pythagorae 19, as cited in Robinson,  Early Greek Philosophy, p. 57].

[14] "Embellished and modernized" is the translation favored by L.A. Post, while "a Socrates become fair and young," is the one offered by R.G. Bury.

 

 

 
 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

The McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology
mcluhan.program@utoronto.ca